Tag: fbi

  • 2 REASONS EPSTEIN FILES AND PHILES WILL STAY REDACTED

    2 REASONS EPSTEIN FILES AND PHILES WILL STAY REDACTED

    There is supposed to be a huge Epstein file dump today. I’m sure there will be some breadcrumbs to follow, but no bread. Why? Two reasons. But we’ll get to those in a moment. First, let’s talk about the files themselves.

    Many people make the mistake of thinking that all of the information we need to identify and prosecute the philes is in the files. But it’s so much bigger than those files. And even more helpful set of data would be Epstein’s finances— which they are guarding like the ark of the covenant. Why? Because every single transaction would lead to every single felon criminal he did crimes with. And that trail would lead to the very TIP TOP of both the government and the private sector.

    Trmp has repeatedly called the philes a “hoax,” but when media catches him off guard, he acknowledges that they’re anything but a hoax, and he confesses that if the files are released UNREDACTED, “a lot of people would get hurt.” When he says that, and he has said it more than once now, he’s not only referring to the victims or the innocent background people who did not commit crimes (as he would have us believe he is referring to); he’s referring to the people—his close friends in high places— who committed the crimes. THEY will get hurt. And not just judicially, but physically.

    What I believe he’s referring to is the RAGE that would ripple through society as people learned of the heinousness of these crimes and the personalities involved, and the physical backlash that would follow; backlash that would be so severe, that it could potentially topple the institutions that maintain civility and order.

    When he says “a lot of people could get hurt,“ I think he’s referring not just to a few philes here and there, but entire institutions, which would have colossal implications for all of society. Could it be that big? Could it cause that much backlash? Absolutely it could. There is a strong possibility it poses such a national security threat that even if they wanted to release unredacted, they can’t, because the backlash would be unbearable.

    About those two reasons the files and the philes will never be unredacted? 1 The people involved are in charge of law-enforcement and the entire judicial system. 2 The official excuse (or bluff) of NATIONAL SECURITY. As long as those two factors are in place, the chances of them actually releasing the files UNREDACTED so we can prosecute the philes are slim to none, save for a rogue whistleblower who decides to release their own (a possibility that I’m sure keeps them up at night, gnawing their nails to bloody nubs).

    And admittedly, I for one continue to hope such a rogue whistleblower should find the bravery to take a stand and transmit.

  • BREAKING: Patel instructed FBI to redact Trump‘s name from Epstein files

    The FBI is facing backlash after it was revealed that Donald Trump’s name was deliberately redacted from the Jeffrey Epstein files, despite earlier promises of transparency. According to multiple sources, FBI FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) teams blacked out Trump’s name, citing privacy exemptions typically used to protect private citizens—even though Trump is a former and now sitting president.

    The redactions were made under FOIA Exemptions 6 and 7(C), which shield individuals from “unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” Officials argued that Trump was a private citizen when much of the Epstein investigation began in 2006. However, clearly this decision reflects FBI/DOJ favoritism toward Trump, especially since Trump had previously promised to declassify the files.

    While other high-profile names were also redacted, Trump’s stands out due to his past promises and his role in overseeing the process. Unless Trump waives his privacy rights, we may never know the full extent of his ties to Epstein.

    One thing is for sure, this is not a transparent government. The FBI and DOJ have colluded to conceal the names of people who potentially committed crimes against children in many others. Citizens don’t get these luxuries of privacy, neither should government officials. The public deserves the unreacted files NOW.

    More: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-08-01/fbi-redacted-president-donald-trump-s-name-in-the-epstein-files