Questions for those who still believe the Charlie Kirk official narrative…

SINCERE QUESTIONS for those who still believe the official narrative. Feel free to respond to one and/or all of these. Let’s talk about it.

How do you explain all the video footage that shows Kirk as he gets shot, but then immediately zooms out (or someone steps in front of the camera ) so you can’t see what happens next?

How do you explain the ballistics? The FBI claims a highly powerful 30.06 was used to shoot Kirk, yet every single demo that hunters, snipers, and gun owners have posted show that a 30.06 round would’ve blown his neck apart and absolutely shattered and gone right through his spinal column? There’s literally no way that the bullet could’ve ever lodged right under the skin as the ER surgeon is claiming.

How do you explain the fact that the Dairy Queen that Tyler Robinson was supposedly shown at after the event is now closed and the inside has been totally cleared out? Is this purely a coincidence?

How do you explain how Kirk security team completely cleared out the tent before law-enforcement even arrived, and even with the presence of MULTIPLE law-enforcement officers, the crime scene wasn’t taped off until hours later? One of Kirk’s people actually grabbed the chair he was sitting on and stood on it to pull the camera off the tent and remove the SD card from it.

How do you explain how Kirk’s security team, which is supposedly made up of former Navy seals, Secret Service people, and the very best of the best security people getting paid hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, ALL would fail to check the rooftops, even though they had multiple drones in the air? between Kirk security team and local law-enforcement, they had to be at least 50 of them, yet nobody checked the rooftops, even after Trump was allegedly shot from a rooftop in Butler Pennsylvania??

How do you explain Kirk security team and local law-enforcement ignoring the guy who told them he could see a shadowy figure up on the roof? Why didn’t they radio that to all of each other and get Charlie out of the way as soon as they learned it? Why did they ignore the guy?

How do you explain the presence of EMTs who walked up to the SUV as they were putting Kirk into it and offered Help and Kirk security team refused their help? they were carrying huge medical bags of the very types of resources that he needed at that second, yet they would rather drive him many miles to the hospital?

How do you explain Donald Trump less than 24 hours after Charlie his top maga marketer, dear friend, whom he called “a son” to him was brutally executed in front of the whole world , was at a Yankees game dancing to YMCA? when a reporter asked him how he was holding up in the wake of Charlie’s death, he said just fine and then wanted to talk about the ballroom construction?

How do you explain the ridiculous supposed text message conversation between Tyler Robinson and his supposedly trans roommate? How do you explain the detailed admission he gives his roommate over easily accessible, text messaging, and then follows up with “don’t talk to law-enforcement about anything”? he literally tells law-enforcement everything over text, knowing they will be able to read his texts, then says not to talk to law-enforcement. How does this make even a single bit of sense? He’s a “reddit lid” and computer nerd and gamer. He knows how all of this works.

How do you explain the media narrative that he initially told his parents that he didn’t want to live and he was going to kill himself, then suddenly he does a flip-flop and demands a peaceful arrest because he doesn’t want to die?

How do you explain how everyone in TPUSA, including Kirk’s wife, everyone in the Trump circle, all of Trump’s most passionate and fervent supporters, everyone in government, the entire media, everyone except us tinfoil hats, happily go along with the official narrative and never even question it even though countless videos and testimonies, have emerged that called the official narrative into extreme question?

How do you explain the presence of the “47“ hat in every single key image of the event, next to Erika Kirk when she does the podcast statement, all over the memorial,
in Charlie seat at the return of the podcast, and in nearly every single TPUSA sponsored ad on Facebook after his desk? Do you sincerely think this is just a coincidence?

How do you explain how Charlie Kirk is allegedly shot during the conversation with the kid about trans mass shootings and one of the bullet casings refers to trans and Tyler Robinson is supposedly dating a trans and Trump/Kirk supporters are highly anti-trans? Do you sincerely believe all of this is just a coincidence?

How do you explain the eruption under Charlie shirt before we see the wound in his neck? ? if the official narrative is true that he was shot in the front of the neck, shouldn’t it be the other way around? Shouldn’t we see the wound first followed by the reaction of his shirt? why do you supposed to shirt erupts first? and you can’t say it was a ricochet off a bulletproof vest because law-enforcement and the hospital that treated him said he was shot in the front of the neck.

How do you explain that right before the shot Kirk bows his head and closes his eyes? Are you aware this is highly out of character for him in a debate environment like this? Do you think it was just a coincidence that he closes his eyes and appears to brace for something? Are you also aware that right before the shot someone can be heard saying “stay down“? Are you also aware that his security team was much further away from him than they usually are?

How do you explain how the sniper could have seen Kirk’s head and neck from a position 50 to 60 feet above him when Kirk was elevated 2 feet off the ground under a tent with a 12 inch drape in the front? I have already provided a video with all of the Math that says it would be impossible for a sniper on that building to see his head and neck— especially when the student video before the event shows the alleged sniper laying 4 feet back from the ledge of the building, which would make it impossible for him to see Kirk.

How do you explain how every single video that could show us Kirk’s condition after the shooting has been blurred out?? They are claiming that the videos are too graphic to show us, yet they continue to allow the videos showing us him literally getting shot in the neck and bleeding out in front of everyone??

How do you explain in the video where his security team is tending to him on the ground that they don’t seem the least bit bothered by what has happened? Not only are they stone faced, but at one point one of them appears to be smiling. If that isn’t bad enough, they are not communicating to each other whatsoever. why isn’t anyone screaming – for example – “come on Charlie! Stay with us, buddy!” like human beings do in these situations??

How do you explain the absence of all the other videos that were shot that day? When the cameras pan around at the audience, literally hundreds of people are shooting videos when he was shot. Where are all those videos???

How do you explain how immediately following the shooting Donald Trump and his people and supporters began referring to the “lunatic left” and how they had to be stopped without even knowing for sure who had done it and what evidence had merged to prove they had done it? ? shortly there after Donald Trump declared “antifa” the enemy of America and wrote an executive order to deem them as a terrorist group. Do you think he would have been able to do that without the Kirk shooting? why were they so quick to embrace that narrative simply on the testimony of the Utah governor and Kash Patel??

How do you explain the behavior of Erika Kirk? people keep saying “everyone grieves differently“ to excuse it, but the point is everyone sees it. Everyone knows deep down she does not appear to be a widow in mourning after the love of her life was brutally publicly executed. Her and everyone at TPSA seems to have no fear whatsoever that they could be next. They act like there is no threat to them or anyone else. Business as usual.

How do you explain the dark maroon color of the blood as it leaves Charlie’s neck? are you aware that fresh blood is bright, almost fluorescent, red? and you can’t say “he was in the shadows“ because in the same videos, some of the hats are bright red. And if you look at previous event videos, you will also see bright red colors under the tent in the shade.

How do you explain the absence of an ambulance which are always present at these kind of events? especially given the fact that Kirk apparently was fully aware that his life was at stake every time he took the stage?

These are just a few of them many questions I have for those who still believe the official narrative.

Filed under:

Discover more from Bread & Circus News

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments

2 responses to “Questions for those who still believe the Charlie Kirk official narrative…”

  1. Shawna Davis

    Jason Behunin is an Optometrist in Orem, Utah