Bread & Circus News

Category: Epstein Coverup

  • 2 REASONS EPSTEIN FILES AND PHILES WILL STAY REDACTED

    2 REASONS EPSTEIN FILES AND PHILES WILL STAY REDACTED

    There is supposed to be a huge Epstein file dump today. I’m sure there will be some breadcrumbs to follow, but no bread. Why? Two reasons. But we’ll get to those in a moment. First, let’s talk about the files themselves.

    Many people make the mistake of thinking that all of the information we need to identify and prosecute the philes is in the files. But it’s so much bigger than those files. And even more helpful set of data would be Epstein’s finances— which they are guarding like the ark of the covenant. Why? Because every single transaction would lead to every single felon criminal he did crimes with. And that trail would lead to the very TIP TOP of both the government and the private sector.

    Trmp has repeatedly called the philes a “hoax,” but when media catches him off guard, he acknowledges that they’re anything but a hoax, and he confesses that if the files are released UNREDACTED, “a lot of people would get hurt.” When he says that, and he has said it more than once now, he’s not only referring to the victims or the innocent background people who did not commit crimes (as he would have us believe he is referring to); he’s referring to the people—his close friends in high places— who committed the crimes. THEY will get hurt. And not just judicially, but physically.

    What I believe he’s referring to is the RAGE that would ripple through society as people learned of the heinousness of these crimes and the personalities involved, and the physical backlash that would follow; backlash that would be so severe, that it could potentially topple the institutions that maintain civility and order.

    When he says “a lot of people could get hurt,“ I think he’s referring not just to a few philes here and there, but entire institutions, which would have colossal implications for all of society. Could it be that big? Could it cause that much backlash? Absolutely it could. There is a strong possibility it poses such a national security threat that even if they wanted to release unredacted, they can’t, because the backlash would be unbearable.

    About those two reasons the files and the philes will never be unredacted? 1 The people involved are in charge of law-enforcement and the entire judicial system. 2 The official excuse (or bluff) of NATIONAL SECURITY. As long as those two factors are in place, the chances of them actually releasing the files UNREDACTED so we can prosecute the philes are slim to none, save for a rogue whistleblower who decides to release their own (a possibility that I’m sure keeps them up at night, gnawing their nails to bloody nubs).

    And admittedly, I for one continue to hope such a rogue whistleblower should find the bravery to take a stand and transmit.

  • Epstein: “I’m the only one who can take down Trump”

    Epstein: “I’m the only one who can take down Trump”

    Epstein said he had the receipts to take Trump down at the end of 2018 in an email released by Congress. 8 months later he was dead – by suicide. Allegedly.

    What did Epstein have on Trump? Maybe lots of photos with Trump and girls, young girls. He teased photos of girls in his kitchen with Trump in bikinis. Michael Wolff said he saw other photos with Trump and girls in Epstein’s vault.

    Here’s the crazy part: presumably the FBI has the photos. Why haven’t they released them? I think deep down everyone knows why.

    “It will all blow over! They’re really just trying to take down Trump and doing whatever they can to do that…!” an unidentified person wrote to Epstein on Dec. 3, 2018.

    “yes thx,” Epstein replied. “its wild. because i am the one able to take him down.”

    The “unidentified person” could very well be Steve Bannon. He appears to be outraged that the Democrats are trying to take down Trump. But Epstein doesn’t agree with him. Instead, he arrogantly corrects him and at the same time slyly warns him that he wields nuke power over Trump.

    From all of this, I gather that Epstein had the receipts on Trump and was frequently dangling them in people’s faces without any hesitation or trepidation. There’s no way he would have that type of confidence unless he had some big receipts.

    This hasn’t been confirmed by anyone, in fact I’ve never heard anyone raise the possibility, but I’m thinking Bannon connected with Epstein to keep tabs on him at Trump’s behest. He posed as his friend and interviewer, but he was trying to monitor Epstein‘s state of mind and perhaps risk level of nuking Trump— same way Trump put Todd Blanche up to talking to Maxwell a few months ago. Same pattern. 

    The unidentified person’s “it will all blow over, they’re really just trying to take Trump down..” appears to be an effort to both calm Epstein down so he doesn’t do anything rash, like nuke Trump, and at the same time gauge Epstein’s appetite for nuking Trump. It would be interesting to see the emails between these two prior to this one.

    I personally think it’s just a matter of time before the massive receipts start dropping. The concern is that the Trump people have a nuclear option that they will launch in the event that the massive receipts are imminent. What kind of nuclear option? One can only imagine.

    One more thing. The more I learn I about Epstein’s hubris the less I am inclined to believe he killed himself. He had way too much confidence in his knowledge and power. He had even more knowledge than Maxwell. Maxwell  leveraged her knowledge to get moved to a lower security prison and work release. Epstein most certainly could’ve negotiated the same or better for himself with the knowledge he had. And that’s why he is probably no longer with us.

  • Trump has his whole administration helping him conceal the Epstein files…

    Trump has his whole administration helping him conceal the Epstein files…

    The real scandal isn’t that Donald Trump’s name appears in the Epstein files. Everyone with a functioning brain and an internet connection already assumed that. The man’s long, sordid friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, beauty pageants, private parties, “younger side” quotes, and all, has been public knowledge for decades. What’s breaking through now, like cracks in a dam, is something far more damning:

    The cover-up is the crime. And it runs deeper than anyone imagined.
    Thanks to The Wall Street Journal, we now know what Trump knew and when he knew it. Back in May, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche, both handpicked loyalists, sat down with Trump in the White House and told him point-blank: his name appears multiple times in the Epstein documents. Not once. Not vaguely. Multiple times.

    Weeks later, the Department of Justice, under Bondi’s leadership, announced it would not release the full Epstein files to the public. This, after Bondi herself had previously boasted that she had “truckloads” of Epstein documents sitting on her desk, ready to be reviewed. Transparency? That evaporated the moment Trump’s name was confirmed in the stack.
    Trump, of course, did what Trump always does: he lied. In July, asked whether Bondi had told him his name appeared in the files, he replied, “No, no,” with all the empty confidence of a man who’s been gaslighting his way out of scandal since the ‘80s. He then pivoted into a word salad about Comey, Obama, Biden, and the “Russia hoax,” trying to drag every past boogeyman into the flames with him.

    But now Bondi and Blanche themselves have confirmed the briefing happened. So the president lied, again, on camera. And then tried to sue The Wall Street Journal for reporting a truth he had already privately acknowledged.

    And that’s just the beginning of the cover-up.

    The DOJ filed a weak, doomed-to-fail motion to unseal grand jury records, knowing full well that their reasoning, “public interest” wouldn’t meet the legal threshold. Judge Robin Rosenberg rejected it, correctly noting that the DOJ hadn’t attached the request to an active judicial proceeding. In other words, they wanted the appearance of transparency without the risk of actual disclosure.

    Meanwhile, Maxwell’s legal team has entered the chat, opposing the release of those same transcripts while simultaneously negotiating with the DOJ in a possible bid for clemency. Her lawyer even released a statement thanking Trump for his “commitment to uncovering the truth,” which might be the most shamelessly transactional quote of the decade.

    But Bondi’s fingerprints on this mess go back further than her recent U-turn. As Florida’s attorney general during the fallout from Epstein’s original non-prosecution agreement, she never lifted a finger to challenge the 2008 deal that let Epstein walk with a wrist slap. That infamous arrangement, negotiated by then–U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, let Epstein plead guilty to state charges, serve just 13 months (with work release), and secured federal immunity not only for Epstein but for any unnamed “co-conspirators.” Bondi’s office, fully aware of the sweetheart terms, declined to pursue any state-level challenge. Years later, she joined Trump’s administration as AG, the same Trump who rewarded Acosta with a Cabinet post during his first term, naming him Labor Secretary. The message was clear: protect the predator, and you’ll be promoted.

    And let’s not forget who just got fired: Maurene Comey, daughter of James Comey and a key prosecutor in the Epstein and Maxwell cases. Coincidence? Sure. Just like it’s a coincidence that the DOJ’s memo now insists Epstein had no “client list,” no conspiracy, and definitely wasn’t murdered, while key evidence remains sealed and new court filings are deliberately designed to go nowhere.

    And then there’s the now-infamous Sharpie birthday letter to Epstein, where Trump allegedly drew a naked woman and signed his name below the waist. Trump insists it’s not his “language,” even though he’s been caught on video using the word “enigma” (a key term from the letter) repeatedly. And never mind that this is the same man who once bragged about walking in on teenage girls changing at his pageants, because of course he doesn’t doodle.

    This isn’t just about Trump being in the files. It’s about the staggering number of high-ranking officials, media figures, judges, and legal enablers willing to twist themselves into knots to make sure no one ever sees what’s in those files. It’s about the sudden walkbacks, the contradictory statements, the theatrical lawsuits, the sleight-of-hand filings. It’s about how this machine of power, not just political, but cultural, financial, and judicial, is circling the wagons around a man whose connection to Epstein is not just alleged, but documented.

    The public backlash is growing, even among Trump’s own base. The same MAGA faithful who once flooded message boards with conspiracy theories about Epstein and the “client list” are now grappling with the reality that their guy may be the one holding the match over the pile of sealed documents. Elon Musk said as much. So did Sean Hannity, in his own passive-aggressive Fox News way. But the truth keeps coming.
    And still, the walls hold, for now.

    This isn’t just about protecting Trump, it’s about protecting the system that let Epstein thrive. The donors. The CEOs. The foreign royalty. The financiers. The judges. The enablers. The media figures who knew but didn’t say. The government officials who sat on files. The ones who showed up to the parties, cashed the checks, and looked the other way.
    It was never about one man. It’s about the network that feeds off secrecy, silence, and the calculated degradation of the vulnerable. The only thing worse than what Trump might’ve done is the cold, coordinated effort to keep the public from ever knowing.

    So yes, Trump’s name is in the Epstein files. But that’s not the biggest bombshell.

    The real story is how many people in high places were willing to burn down truth, law, and decency to keep it hidden.

    Via: Adam Miller

  • Breaking: judge rules Epstein grand jury statements will remain sealed, DUH…

    Breaking: judge rules Epstein grand jury statements will remain sealed, DUH…

    Well, so much for that Trump promise. When Pam Bondi shockingly announced that the Epstein files were a nothing burger, there would be no investigations, and she wouldn’t be releasing any files, the people raged. Trump tried to make it go away. It didn’t. Trump then promised he would have the grand jury statements unsealed.

    As always, Trump nonchalantly made it sound like unsealing the indictment was just a routine matter that he was making an executive decision on to follow through with his promises to the people. I guarantee you he knew from day one that indictment would never be unsealed, and that is precisely why he promised it. He was just buying time.

    Today a judge announced what we predicted he would announce: the indictment will not be unsealed, ever.

    Wait, but why?

    That part they don’t tell you. But I can tell you.

    Because the indictments level accusations against the sitting president, a former president, and God only knows who else. Releasing them is a matter of national security.

    There is also the very real possibility, as we have reported here previously, that Trump was an informant who gave damning statements to the grand jury in exchange for prosecutorial immunity. if that is the case, there is no chance in hades they would ever unseal an indictment that included Trump’s accusations against Epstein for crimes in which Trump was present to observe. No way in hades.

    So, forget the indictments. Not that they were actually ever in to begin with. Just another Trump distraction to try to get people to calm down.

    I hope people aren’t calming down. I hope this emboldens them even more to rage against this massive cover-up and absolutely demand accountability. It could still happen. If the people keep raging and refrain from doing that one thing they keep doing: forgetting.

    Here’s what all of this means: Trump and the DOJ requested the court unseal the grand jury indictment, knowing damn well they were never going to approve it.

  • “Witness tampering”? Congress wants to know why Trump DOJ is favoring child sex offender Maxwell…

    “Witness tampering”? Congress wants to know why Trump DOJ is favoring child sex offender Maxwell…

    Unless you’ve been living under a rock, convicted child sex trafficker Maxwell has been receiving wonderfully favorable treatment from the Trump administration ever since she interviewed with Trump’s former defense lawyer, Todd Blanche, in a secret jailhouse interview last month.

    Not only did Trump and team transfer her to a relatively luxurious, low security federal prison, but they have also given her freedom rights that sex offenders are forbidden from having at that facility.

    In response, constituents have been ringing their representatives off the hook, demanding to know why the Trump administration is being so nice to a predatory sex offender who is responsible for the molestation of so many children. What in the world did she tell them? Who is she protecting? What deals have been made behind the scenes? Why isn’t the Trump administration being forthcoming about what she said in the top secret DOJ interview?

    Now Congress is finally acting, demanding answers from Trump DOJ chief Pam Bundy, the mastermind of the most worst red flag gun laws in the entire nation. they want to know why she is being so nice to sexual child predators. Here’s an excerpt from the letter they sent to the DOJ today.

    “We write to demand DOJ and BOP provide all documents and information related to Deputy Attorney General Blanche’s interview of Ms. Maxwell and the sudden decision to transfer her to a facility with lower security and greater freedom for inmates, which was, prior to this extraordinary transfer, categorically off limits to sex offenders,” the letter said. “It is imperative that the Administration come clean regarding the full scope of Mr. Blanche’s interview of Ms. Maxwell and the sudden decision to transfer her to a minimum-security prison camp.”

    Unbelievable this is even necessary. If you’ll recall, Trump promised that his administration was going to be the most “transparent in American history.“ They have actually been the most secretive in American history, even worse than the Hoover FBI years.

    Here’s hoping the truth comes out, although I’m not holding my breath 

  • Is Trump’s invasion of DC the start of a 1984 police state? And other questions…

    Is Trump’s invasion of DC the start of a 1984 police state? And other questions…

    I’m old enough to remember a time when the book 1984 was just a fictional work like a Stephen King novel. In light of Trump’s authoritarian directives of late, it’s looking more and more like a documentary every day. Everyone should be asking these questions and more:

    What are the actual crime numbers that are necessitating such a drastic reaction to city crime? Because the last time I checked crime is down substantially in Washington DC from last year. Murder has gone down 26%. Is the Trump administration being honest? Doesn’t sound like it.

    Is the federal takeover of Washington DC a model for the whole country? 

    What does the federal takeover mean for people’s freedoms and quality of life?

    How long will the federal takeover last? And once it presumably comes to an end, will crime then return to its previous levels (since we all know that “Police presence” is only a temporary stop gap measure)

    What are the mental health ramifications for developing minds when there are armed officers standing on every corner?

    What are the repercussions on surrounding cities that do not have federal police presence? In other words did the criminals just move to other cities?

    What exactly does the Trump administration hope to accomplish other than “cleaning up the cesspool“? Is there a target crime rate they are “shooting” for? Or is this just another one of those “we’ll figure it out as we go along “Trump things?

    What are the impacts on the local economy and local businesses who now have federal agent stationed outside their doors? Are consumers more or less likely to patronize them? Also, what are the impacts on tourism? 

    How much does Trump’s “operation DC takeover“ cost taxpayers on a daily basis?

    Were any other measures taken to lower crime prior to launching a federal military takeover? i’m talking about measures such as deleting the draconian gun laws that prevent citizens from defending themselves and/or implementing a “stand your ground” self-defense law? What about mandating the city of Washington DC step up law-enforcement or sanction them heavily? Or did the Trump administration just take the lazy way and start sending troops?

    What is considered “high crime” and at what statistical point is a city considered a “cesspool,“ in the words of Trump, that necessitates military occupation?

    Is the Washington DC invasion actually necessary or is Trump doing this to get his supporters excited and distracted from the Epstein files?

    Is it just me, or is Trump acting more and more like land and power grabber Putin every day? 

  • WHAT? Maxwell now eligible for work release after meeting with Trump DOJ

    WHAT? Maxwell now eligible for work release after meeting with Trump DOJ

    Maxwell must have done Trump an incredible favor because suddenly everything is going great for her. First she got transferred from a high security prison in TN to a low security federal prison in TX, Now her inmate status has changed to OUT, which means eligible to work outside the prison facility with no guards.

    This development is especially shocking since Texas prison rules state that convicted child sex offenders are not eligible for work release. She must’ve done Trump a real solid. What do you suppose she gave him to get such amazing treatment?

    And by the way, are we ever going to get to hear the transcript of Maxwell‘s meeting with Trump‘s DOJ assistant Todd Blanche, who is also the president’s personal former defense lawyer? Whatever happened to being the most transparent administration in history? Trump is actually the most secretive administration ever.

    Read more: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-maxwell-work-release_n_689bb055e4b03bdc474faf9f

  • Survey says! Trump doesn’t care about black people…

    Survey says! Trump doesn’t care about black people…

    20 years ago next month Kanye West famously declared “Bush doesn’t care about Black people,” after Bush’s dismal response to Hurricane Katrina damage in Louisiana. it was a watershed moment because it totally turned the cultural-political tide in America and opened the gates for an Obama presidency a couple years later. One could say Candace Owens recently did the same when she admitted regret for voting for Trump and called him a “chronic disappointment.”

    Owens, who is the leader of the “Blaxit” movement that encouraged Black people to leave the Democrat party, which had a profound impact on the 2024 election, is a cultural heavyweight (6 million followers on FB alone!), and no doubt her words resonate with the lower classes. That may be one of the main reasons 90% of Black people are reporting that they are done with Trump in a new poll.

    Or maybe it’s because Trump invited them to Washington to celebrate Black History Month but then paraded out the Pfizer CEO and honored him as a “great man.” Or maybe it’s because he laid off hundreds of thousands of black federal workers. Or maybe it’s because he didn’t put any Black people in his cabinet. Or maybe it’s because he has decimated DEI programs. Or maybe it’s because he’s filling working class neighborhoods with federal agents and soldiers. Or maybe it’s simply because they, like many of us, have figured out that he simply just doesn’t give a turd about lower income people, small business, and inflation. Or maybe it’s a combination of all of the above. But one way or the other, according to a new YouGov poll, Black people have abandoned hope that Trump is going to help them, and only a shocking 11% approve of his performance.

    Here’s another reason I don’t doubt the new poll. Because I, an independent conservative, feel the same way they do, as do many of my friends who are not black. Hence the reason I tend to think this latest poll is probably spot on, despite the fact that Trump and his holdout black stans will say it is fake news. But for anyone who doubts all of this, I’ve got two words for them: Candace Owens. That’s all I ever really need to know. If Trump can lose her, and he has, he could lose anyone.

    Oh, another reason I should’ve mentioned for the Trump abandonment is the Epstein coverup, especially since it is one of the main reasons Candace Owens has “walked away” from Maga. I have heard from Black people that they were very excited that republican president Trump was going to hold elites in power accountable for crimes they had committed against children, and they were greatly disappointed when it became apparent that he instead was going to protect them. Can’t blame them. Feel the same way.

    I believe all of this will be a problem for Trump and the Republican Party in the midterms. Of course Trump has the power to turn it around before then, but I doubt he will. I think he is on a mission to facilitate the technocrat technology takeover of America, and therefore the economic situation will only get worse and worse for the lower classes, especially as more government jobs, many of which are held by minorities, get replaced by robots.

    One more thing. People who have followed me for a while now that I often say “Trump better be careful, if he loses the culture, he will lose America.“ It’s happening. He is losing the culture. America will be next.

    Here’s the good news, there are a lot of Americans out there from both sides who are fed up with both parties. There is still a chance we could come together for an independent candidate who is neither republican nor democrat and wants to hold both parties responsible for their crimes against the American people. I haven’t abandoned hope for that yet. 

  • Maxwell has dirt on Trump, used as leverage for prison xfer according to…

    Maxwell has dirt on Trump, used as leverage for prison xfer according to…

    A prisoner at the Tallahassee Florida correctional facility, where Maxwell was being held prior to her interview with Trump’s DOJ, is reporting that she heard Maxwell say she has dirt on Trump and was going to use it as leverage for political favors. 

    The prisoner also said she believes Maxwell leveraged her knowledge of Epstein’s client list to get transferred from the Tallahassee prison to the upgraded Texas federal prison.

    When Trump was asked if Maxwell made a deal with his DOJ to spill the beans in exchange for a prison transfer, he claimed to know nothing about it. He even says he hasn’t been following the case, which of course means that he has been following it very closely, and has probably been involved in every single decision.

    Interesting to say the least.

    By the way, where is the transcript of the DOJ interview with Maxwell? What’s with all the secrecy? Why the delay? I imagine they are redacting every instance of every name that could cause this administration problems, including Trump’s.

    Will we ever get the truth? Probably not. So much for being “the most transparent administration in history.” Promises made, promises not kept.