If you are triggered easily, you might not want to read this. We are in the business of truth digging, and it can be a very unsettling and uncomfortable business, especially for those who cling to official narratives. You’ve been warned.
If Charlie Kirk is dead, God rest his soul. He was a young dude, still learning. He had some things right, he had many things wrong, particularly his diehard support for team Trump, especially in light of everything that has happened and not happened since Trump took power again.
The very fact that Kirk was still giving out 47 and Maga hats at his event on the day he departed is disturbing to say the least. you’d have to be quite blind to still think the Trump political group is the solution for America , let alone representative of truth and justice and love and Jesus.
Was Kirk under obligation to keep supporting Trump? Was he still blind and devoted? Was he torn? We will never know now because they aren’t gonna tell us the truth. They are gonna do everything in their power to conceal the truth and wipe any evidence that could help us learn it.
Of the many things I’ve heard since Kirk departed though, him saying that his wife is “way more conservative“ than him in a video they did together is one of the strangest. He laughed and said he was a “moderate“ compared to her. This raises a lot of questions, of course. The main question is: how do they define conservative? Because he was already pro-life, anti woke, and very constitutionally focused, especially with respect to the first and second amendment, which is considered “far right” by most standards.
My thought is by “conservative“ he may have meant pro Maga Trump party, since most conservatives of America have decided that Trump embodies conservatism (by the way, he does not, not even close). If my thought is right, that means Erika was the diehard Trump supporter in the relationship, and she most likely was a major influence on him to be the same. It might even mean that she is the one that lined up all the Trump merch for his events and what not.
This angle has legs in more ways than one. First of all, it is now coming out that her mother was involved— Erika uses the word “involved” a lot— with “the government and homeland security department.” Her father designed a Trump building. How long has she known Trump personally? How close was she with Trump? I mean, after all, she was a pageant queen in at least one of his pageants.
So, when Charlie said “Erika’s way more conservative than me“ was he saying that she is way more Trump than him? And if yes, does this mean that she plays a huge role to MAGAFY the TPSUSA movement— and potentially even on behalf of Trump?
And if yes, would this explain why she immediately took the TPUSA helm after Charlie left—even though she has zero qualifications to be a CEO of a multimillion dollar organization— and immediately began saturating social media and email with images of her and Charlie in Maga gear nonstop and asking for donations?
And if yes, would that also explain why Trump was the keynote speaker at the memorial, and Trump held her in his arms while the cameras kicked away and they sang America the beautiful together? By the way where was Melania during this moment? I don’t even recall seeing Melania at the event.
One thing I know for sure today. I have far more questions than I have answers. This is the most suspicious and unsettling event that I have ever witnessed in my half century. I don’t want to think that my government could be involved in such a heinous conspiracy, but there are just so many questions that keep nagging me. And every day I have more and more questions and less and less answers.
Comments
2 responses to “I can’t stop thinking about this wild thing Charlie Kirk said about his wife Erika..”
you are much more diplomatic than me. I think it’s a Trump operation. It has his name written all over it.
The way she cuddled up to Trump was sickening. TPUSA I still feel will fall under his thumb. The young came to TPUSA to follow the strong religious movement not to create a stronger political group. Further the sadness she attempted to display was a very poor representation of one grieving.